Quantcast
Channel: Bogleheads.org
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 4514

Personal Investments • Why the case against a Roth conversion gets stronger?

$
0
0

Sorry, I've heard others try to explain or justify conversions with the same examples.
If you don't convert your traditional IRA it continues to grow tax free on 100,000$ instead of 78,000$ you also have 22,000 more in your account without a conversion. In other words your net worth is 22,000 more. I just don't see the math any other way.
That $22,000 is only your money on paper! The reality is that the IRS owns that money, not you. The government co-owns a sizable part of every TIRA/Trad 401k, how much is obviously dependent on your tax bracket when you withdraw.
Roth money is all yours, plus no RMDs for you or your heirs. Bonus- If you pay the conversion taxes from outside the TIRA, you effectively have increased the size of your Roth- $100k tax-free in a Roth is far superior to $78k after-tax in TIRA. Yes, you're out the $22k in taxable, but that money was subject to tax drag anyway.
+1

Statistics: Posted by RetiredAL — Sun Dec 08, 2024 9:44 am — Replies 54 — Views 3708



Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 4514

Trending Articles



<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>